<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Step 8. Register your phone number at e164.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wirevolution.com/step-8-register-your-phone-number-at-e164org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wirevolution.com</link>
	<description>Mobile Unified Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ronald geerligs</title>
		<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/step-8-register-your-phone-number-at-e164org/comment-page-1/#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator>ronald geerligs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirevolution.com/?page_id=564#comment-7307</guid>
		<description>In the Netherlands all PSTN uses G7.11.
However only 60 entries in ENUM and they are only mobiles, reverting to G.729. And registering costs 7 EUR for mobile, 17.50 for localased e164. Nonen entered yet.

All Voipers revert to PSTN for touting.

Pitty. 
G.722(both of them, 10 and 20 msec) on 650&#039;s is great, ONLY if it is an SBC to SBC contract. Otherwise back to e164 andn G.711. Lamentfully.

I realy appreciate your site and the ability to just comment without logging in or so. You have done a great job!

I only have a Polycom 610

Greetz, Ronald</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Netherlands all PSTN uses G7.11.<br />
However only 60 entries in ENUM and they are only mobiles, reverting to G.729. And registering costs 7 EUR for mobile, 17.50 for localased e164. Nonen entered yet.</p>
<p>All Voipers revert to PSTN for touting.</p>
<p>Pitty.<br />
G.722(both of them, 10 and 20 msec) on 650&#8217;s is great, ONLY if it is an SBC to SBC contract. Otherwise back to e164 andn G.711. Lamentfully.</p>
<p>I realy appreciate your site and the ability to just comment without logging in or so. You have done a great job!</p>
<p>I only have a Polycom 610</p>
<p>Greetz, Ronald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronald geerligs</title>
		<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/step-8-register-your-phone-number-at-e164org/comment-page-1/#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator>ronald geerligs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirevolution.com/?page_id=564#comment-7306</guid>
		<description>e164.arpa seems to work where applied</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e164.arpa seems to work where applied</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
