<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are we waiting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wirevolution.com/2009/12/04/why-are-we-waiting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2009/12/04/why-are-we-waiting/</link>
	<description>Mobile Unified Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:47:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2009/12/04/why-are-we-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-7406</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirevolution.com/?p=1042#comment-7406</guid>
		<description>Related rant from David Pogue:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/10/technology/personaltech/10pogue.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Not yet the season for a Nook&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;Worse, the touch screen is balky and nonresponsive, even for the Nook product manager who demonstrated it for me. The only thing slower than the color strip is the main screen above it. Even though it’s exactly the same E Ink technology that the Kindle and Sony Readers use, the Nook’s screen is achingly slower than the Kindle’s. It takes nearly three seconds to turn a page — three times longer than the Kindle — which is really disruptive if you’re in midsentence.

&quot;Often, you tap some button on the color strip — and nothing happens. You wait for the Nook to respond, but there’s no progress bar, no hourglass, no indication that the Nook “heard” you. So you tap again — but now you’ve just triggered a second command that you didn’t want.

&quot;It takes four seconds for the Settings panel to open, 18 seconds for the bookstore to appear (over Wi-Fi), and 8 to 15 seconds to open a book or newspaper for the first time, during which you stare at a message that says “Formatting.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Related rant from David Pogue:<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/10/technology/personaltech/10pogue.html" rel="nofollow">Not yet the season for a Nook</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Worse, the touch screen is balky and nonresponsive, even for the Nook product manager who demonstrated it for me. The only thing slower than the color strip is the main screen above it. Even though it’s exactly the same E Ink technology that the Kindle and Sony Readers use, the Nook’s screen is achingly slower than the Kindle’s. It takes nearly three seconds to turn a page — three times longer than the Kindle — which is really disruptive if you’re in midsentence.</p>
<p>&#8220;Often, you tap some button on the color strip — and nothing happens. You wait for the Nook to respond, but there’s no progress bar, no hourglass, no indication that the Nook “heard” you. So you tap again — but now you’ve just triggered a second command that you didn’t want.</p>
<p>&#8220;It takes four seconds for the Settings panel to open, 18 seconds for the bookstore to appear (over Wi-Fi), and 8 to 15 seconds to open a book or newspaper for the first time, during which you stare at a message that says “Formatting.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.283 seconds -->

