<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wideband codecs and IPR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/</link>
	<description>Mobile Unified Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wirevolution &#187; Skype&#8217;s SILK codec available royalty free to third parties</title>
		<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Wirevolution &#187; Skype&#8217;s SILK codec available royalty free to third parties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/#comment-844</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote earlier about the need for royalty-free wideband codecs, and about a conversation with Jonathan Christensen about SILK, Skype&#8217;s new super-wideband [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote earlier about the need for royalty-free wideband codecs, and about a conversation with Jonathan Christensen about SILK, Skype&#8217;s new super-wideband [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Xiph.org codecs are released under &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node15.html#sec:Speex-License&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Xiph&#039;s version of the (revised) BSD license&lt;/a&gt;, which means that you can distribute them provided you include a notice in the documentation.  

There is no patent pool for G.722.2 (AMR-WB). Each of the companies that currently claims patent rights on AMR-WB (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voiceage.com/licensing.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VoiceAge&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nokia.com/A4126689&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nokia&lt;/a&gt; and Ericsson) must be negotiated with individually. 

Wideband versions of G.711 and G.729 are licensed from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sipro.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sipro&lt;/a&gt;. 

None of these (xiph, VoiceAge, Sipro, Nokia, Ericsson) appear as members of IPsupermarket.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xiph.org codecs are released under <a href="http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node15.html#sec:Speex-License" rel="nofollow">Xiph&#8217;s version of the (revised) BSD license</a>, which means that you can distribute them provided you include a notice in the documentation.  </p>
<p>There is no patent pool for G.722.2 (AMR-WB). Each of the companies that currently claims patent rights on AMR-WB (<a href="http://www.voiceage.com/licensing.php" rel="nofollow">VoiceAge</a>, <a href="http://www.nokia.com/A4126689" rel="nofollow">Nokia</a> and Ericsson) must be negotiated with individually. </p>
<p>Wideband versions of G.711 and G.729 are licensed from <a href="http://www.sipro.com/" rel="nofollow">Sipro</a>. </p>
<p>None of these (xiph, VoiceAge, Sipro, Nokia, Ericsson) appear as members of IPsupermarket.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keanu</title>
		<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>keanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Can this wideband codecs can be licensed or commercialized at IP portal such as http://www.ipsupermarket.com, design-reuse or chipestimate etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can this wideband codecs can be licensed or commercialized at IP portal such as <a href="http://www.ipsupermarket.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipsupermarket.com</a>, design-reuse or chipestimate etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Graves</title>
		<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Graves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/12/04/wideband-codecs-and-ipr/#comment-804</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Have you had a look at the new CELT codec being developed by Xiph.org? It claims to support, amongst other things, sample rates as high as 48 khz in bit rates from 48 kbps.

It&#039;s from the same group responsible for Speex. I wonder if it might achieve greater acceptance, or if such efforts are doomed to limited uptake by commercial entities?

Michael Graves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Have you had a look at the new CELT codec being developed by Xiph.org? It claims to support, amongst other things, sample rates as high as 48 khz in bit rates from 48 kbps.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s from the same group responsible for Speex. I wonder if it might achieve greater acceptance, or if such efforts are doomed to limited uptake by commercial entities?</p>
<p>Michael Graves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
