<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dual mode phone trends - update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/09/25/dual-mode-phone-trends-update-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/09/25/dual-mode-phone-trends-update-2/</link>
	<description>Mobile Unified Communications</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/09/25/dual-mode-phone-trends-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/09/25/dual-mode-phone-trends-update-2/#comment-801</guid>
		<description>I agre that the outlook looks good for Wi-Fi on the handset, since the growth of smartphones is underway and most fo the top smartphones are now sporting Wi-Fi. [http://imcellular.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/wi-fi-appearing-in-smartphones/] 11 of the top 15 smartphones recently reviewed by PC Magazine include Wi-Fi!

I suspect that there are many motivations, not the least being that operators recognize that the free use of Wi-Fi greatly reduces the burden on their networks, and they foresee an explosion in data use: I've seen forecasts of 1000% traffic increase in 5 years). With traffic increasing 1000% and revenues increasing 100%, the operators are in a bind. Hence the desire to offload on Wi-Fi and--even better for Operators--Femtocell. [http://imcellular.wordpress.com/tag/femtocell/]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agre that the outlook looks good for Wi-Fi on the handset, since the growth of smartphones is underway and most fo the top smartphones are now sporting Wi-Fi. [http://imcellular.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/wi-fi-appearing-in-smartphones/] 11 of the top 15 smartphones recently reviewed by PC Magazine include Wi-Fi!</p>
<p>I suspect that there are many motivations, not the least being that operators recognize that the free use of Wi-Fi greatly reduces the burden on their networks, and they foresee an explosion in data use: I&#8217;ve seen forecasts of 1000% traffic increase in 5 years). With traffic increasing 1000% and revenues increasing 100%, the operators are in a bind. Hence the desire to offload on Wi-Fi and&#8211;even better for Operators&#8211;Femtocell. [http://imcellular.wordpress.com/tag/femtocell/]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Finneran</title>
		<link>http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/09/25/dual-mode-phone-trends-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Finneran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wirevolution.com/2008/09/25/dual-mode-phone-trends-update-2/#comment-796</guid>
		<description>The fundamental difficulty with 802.11n is power. With the requirement to drive multiple radios, providing 802.11n in a battery-powered device will be a challenge.

The Wi-Fi Alliance has proposed an n-capable interface for voice devices that will use a single transmit chain, and hence, one radio. The advantage of this approach is somewhat in question, because with a single transmit chain, 802.11n doesn't provide much more capacity than 802.11a or g.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fundamental difficulty with 802.11n is power. With the requirement to drive multiple radios, providing 802.11n in a battery-powered device will be a challenge.</p>
<p>The Wi-Fi Alliance has proposed an n-capable interface for voice devices that will use a single transmit chain, and hence, one radio. The advantage of this approach is somewhat in question, because with a single transmit chain, 802.11n doesn&#8217;t provide much more capacity than 802.11a or g.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.392 seconds -->
